From Belief to Embodied Perception
This project studies not only what people believed, but how they perceived others through bodies, spaces, habits, and sensory expectations.
A Digital Sensory History Exhibition
Mental Illness, Religion, and Sensory Stigma
精神疾病、宗教与感官污名
This digital exhibition explores how mental illness has been perceived through sight, sound, smell, touch, and sacred space across different historical periods. Rather than treating stigma as only an idea or belief, this project asks how stigma was felt, seen, heard, smelled, touched, and spatially organized.
Start Here
Current path: Not selected
Object Hotspots
Move through the archive desk directly. Click a glowing point, test a text or image fragment, and let the interface suggest which sensory lens might be most relevant.
Research Question
Sensory Lenses
Curated Archive
Prototype entries for educational use. Further primary-source verification required.
Research Trail
Your research trail helps you trace how different senses produced different forms of stigma across history.
Compare Entries
Select two prototype entries to compare period, sensory lens, source type, authority, and stigma mechanism.
Mini Exhibition Builder
A good mini-exhibition does not just collect objects. It makes an argument.
一个好的小展览不只是收集材料,而是提出一个观点。
Archive Passport
Your Archive Passport tracks how widely you have explored the exhibition.
Completed 0 / 10
Mystery of Interpretation
Choose the strongest interpretation. If your answer is not the strongest one, the feedback will explain another possible reading.
Sensory Lens Mixer
Combine a sense, context, and authority to form your own historically grounded question.
Historical Path
Concept Map
Hover a node to trace related terms. Click one to read its interpretive note.
Select a concept to see how it helps explain sensory stigma.
Terms
Source Lab
Two Voices
The same sensory event can mean different things depending on who has authority to interpret it.
Then / Now Reflection
Methodology
This project studies not only what people believed, but how they perceived others through bodies, spaces, habits, and sensory expectations.
Historical mental distress was often judged through voices, odors, gestures, spatial behavior, and visible difference before modern diagnostic language dominated.
The website combines historical sources, interpretation, and visitor interaction as a digital humanities prototype rather than a final scholarly database.
The exhibition avoids sensationalizing mental illness and emphasizes historical context, critical reading, and respect for patient experience.
Ethical Reflection
This project studies historical stigma without reproducing it. Terms such as “madness,” “insanity,” or “possession” are used as historical categories, not as labels for people today. The exhibition asks viewers to examine how societies created fear and exclusion through sensory interpretation.
本项目研究历史中的污名,但不希望复制污名。“疯癫”“精神错乱”“附身”等词语在这里作为历史概念使用,而不是对当代个体的标签。本展览希望观众思考:社会如何通过感官解释制造恐惧、排斥和控制。
Visitor Reflection
Which sense do you think has been most powerful in shaping stigma against mental illness: sight, sound, smell, touch, or sacred space? Why?
Reflection Checkpoint
Choose a prompt, write 1-2 sentences, and save it into your notebook.
Learning Output
This panel gathers your research questions, saved prompts, source notes, visitor reflection, checkpoints, and mini-exhibition thesis.
Curator Prompt
Future Development
Religious texts, asylum reports, photographs, medical writings, films, and news reports.
150-250 word interpretive labels for each archive entry.
Key terms in sensory history, religious history, and medical humanities.
Allow classmates to contribute mini archive entries or reflections.
Add citation system, source database, interactive map, and peer-reviewed bibliography.